United States v. Dunten

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that \an insurer must defend an action even if only a small portion of the conduct alleged in the complaint falls within the scope of the insurance policy.\
• rejecting argument that price-fixing claim in complaint which also contained covered advertising injury claim necessarily alleged antitrust criminal activity
• reiterating “the principle that if any of the conduct alleged in the complaint falls within the scope of the insurance policy, the insurer must defend”
• conduct, and not legal label attached to conduct, is what is important in evaluating policy coverage
• a meaning ascribed to policy term will not be a reasonable interpretation where that meaning is divorced from the term’s contextual usage and the common understandings in the industry
• an insurance policy covering \unfair competition\ requires the insurer to defend a claim of false advertising and related fraud, but not an antitrust claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).