United States v. Dunnahoe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding Department of Agriculture’s retroactive revocation of claimant’s feed grain contracts for fraud
• Government’s refusal to allow plaintiff’s participation in agricultural program justified by plaintiff’s violation of applicable regulations
• “factual determinations made by the agency ... are entitled to finality ... and the decisions of the agency based on such factual determinations are also entitled to finality [unless unlawful, arbitrary or capricious] [emphasis added]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).