United States v. Duka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the district court did not abuse its discretion when it entered violent jihadist training videos into evidence in a sanitized form to show the defendants’ state of mind in planning an attack on the United States
• stating “courts have concluded that the important national interest in foreign intelligence gathering justifies electronic surveillance without prior judicial review, creating a sort of 'foreign intelligence exception’ to the Fourth Amendment’s warrant requirement,” and collecting cases
• evidence derived from a reasonable search is admissible in a criminal trial
• applying Fed. R. Crim. P. 52(b)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).