United States v. Duarte-Gandarilla

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Claims for alienation of affections “accrue[ ] when ‘the alienation or loss of affection is finally accomplished.’”
• Claims for alienation of affections “accrue[] when ‘the alienation or loss of affection is finally accomplished.’”
• “Defendant’s generalized difficulty in traveling to Mississippi is not a burden violative of due process.”
• “Defendant’s generalized difficulty in traveling to Mississippi is not a burden violative of due process.”
• Mississippi resident sued his wife’s paramour, a Massachusetts resident, for alienation of affections. The court found the requirements for personal jurisdiction were satisfied in Mississippi.
• “Especially given Mississippi’s determination to retain a cause of action for alienation of affections, Mississippi has an interest in protecting its residents’ rights in their marital relationships and providing them a convenient forum for redress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).