United States v. Duane Jones

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• remanding because the oral pronouncement did not include a restriction included in the written judgment
• “In cases where there is a direct conflict between an unambiguous oral pronouncement of sentence and the written judgment . . . the oral pronouncement, as correctly reported, must control.” (quoting United States v. Hicks, 997 F.2d 594, 597 (9th Cir. 1993))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).