United States v. Douglas Nyhuis, United States of America v. Anicia Marivel Ripoll, A/K/A Anicia Goodman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the government did not violate an immunity agreement where the agreement limited its protection to information already disclosed to the government and the informa tion used against the defendant was provided post-agreement
• holding that the government did not violate an immunity agreement where the agreement limited its protection to information already disclosed to the government and the information used against the defendant was provided post-agreement
• disregarding, for double jeopardy purposes, a charge “which was dismissed pursuant to [a] plea agreement because jeopardy did not attach to that dismissed charge”
• “We may disregard the § 846 conspiracy charge in the Michigan indictment which was dismissed pursuant to Nyhuis’s plea agreement because jeopardy did not attach to that dismissed charge.”
• “Prior convictions of a defendant routinely are used to determine the quantity of sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).