United States v. Douglas Meeks

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding impeachment evidence was “insufficient to show an acquittal would be likely” because other -7- evidence was overwhelming
• “In order to meet the materiality requirement, newly discovered evidence must be more than merely impeaching.” (cleaned up) (quoting United States v. Baker, 479 F.3d 574, 577 (8th Cir. 2007))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).