Skip to main content
· 2/10/2004

United States v. Douglas Lumir Stolba

Citations

  • 357 F.3d 850
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 2072
  • 2004 WL 235206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that § 3C1.1 included specific language that precluded its application to prior obstructive conduct

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Heaney, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.