Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Seventh Circuit· 10/7/2005

United States v. Douglas Long

Citations

  • 425 F.3d 482
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 21699
  • 2005 WL 2465006

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that forensic search of computer did not exceed scope of consent to search defendant's office, including his computer, when consent was given \with no limitations or qualifications\
  • holding that unlimited consent to search office and laptop authorized forensic search of computer
  • holding that forensic search of computer did not exceed scope of consent to search defendant’s office, including his computer, when consent was given “with no limitations or qualifications”
  • “After Booker, all sentences, including those that are above or below the range that the guidelines would advise (i.e., those that we would have described as the result of ‘departures’ in the pre- Booker world), are to be reviewed for reasonableness.”
  • “Freed from the mandatory nature of [the Guidelines], the court will be free to consider the factors outlined in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), including those that were specifically prohibited by the guidelines and those that are not constitutionally prohibited such as race or sex.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kanne, Wood, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.