United States v. Douglas Long

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that forensic search of computer did not exceed scope of consent to search defendant's office, including his computer, when consent was given \with no limitations or qualifications\
• holding that unlimited consent to search office and laptop authorized forensic search of computer
• holding that forensic search of computer did not exceed scope of consent to search defendant’s office, including his computer, when consent was given “with no limitations or qualifications”
• “After Booker, all sentences, including those that are above or below the range that the guidelines would advise (i.e., those that we would have described as the result of ‘departures’ in the pre- Booker world), are to be reviewed for reasonableness.”
• “Freed from the mandatory nature of [the Guidelines], the court will be free to consider the factors outlined in 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a), including those that were specifically prohibited by the guidelines and those that are not constitutionally prohibited such as race or sex.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).