· 1/21/2005
United States v. Douglas B. Leuschen
Citations
- 395 F.3d 155
- 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 1094
- 2005 WL 120067
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that restoration of only two out of three rights lost was insufficient
- upholding conviction where predicate felony conviction was based on a statute that had been amended prior to trial
- evidence firearms were manufactured outside Pennsylvania provided proof of requisite nexus to interstate commerce
- discussing the meaning of “civil rights” in our circuit
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Nygaard, Rosenn, Becker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.