United States v. Doughman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[i]n the absence of evidence to the contrary, we will presume that the convening authority has considered clemency matters submitted by the appellant prior to taking action.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• United States v. McCALLON
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2017-04-27
• United States v. Caple
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2018-01-26
• United States v. Williams
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 2005-05-31

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• United States v. Tyndale
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2001-12-17· cited 25×
• United States v. Stephens
  Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 2002-04-10· cited 10×
• United States v. Zaptin
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 1995-02-17· cited 6×
• United States v. Tyndale
  Navy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals· 1999-09-29· cited 3×