United States v. Donville James

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating Sixth Amendment does not bar out-of-court statements when statements not offered to prove truth of matter asserted
• absent any showing that the jury could not follow the court’s limiting instruction, this court presumes that the jury limited its considera- tion of the testimony in accordance with the court’s 10 No. 07-3383 instruction
• “When out‐of‐court statements are not offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, the Confrontation Clause is satisfied if the defendant had the opportunity to cross‐examine the person repeating the No. 08‐2208 Page 6 out‐of‐court statement.”
• “Prompted by Serfling’s timely objection, the district court immediately halted the pros- ecutor’s improper line of questioning and issued a curative instruction to the jury, the substance of which the court repeated during its final jury instructions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).