United States v. Donte Hammond

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the Bureau of Prisons was acting in the ordinary course of its duties by routinely monitoring inmate telephone calls
• finding that the defendant consented to the interception of his conversations because he was notified of recording and nonetheless used the telephone
• finding that the defendant consented to the interception of his conversations because he was notified of recording and nonetheless used the telephone
• holding law-enforcement exception to federal wiretap statute applied to recording of defendant’s call from jail because the bureau of prisons “was acting pursuant to- its well-known policies in the ordinary course of its duties in taping the calls”
• finding implied consent from notice through two handbooks, a consent form, an orientation lecture, and posted signs
• finding consent when a prison required monitoring “as a condition of using prison telephones”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).