United States v. Donato Telesco, A/K/A Danny Telesco, and Scott Linskey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, when a crime is designated as a \crime of violence\ by the Sentencing Commission, this Circuit shall employ a categorical approach and the sentencing court may not inquire into the facts underlying that offense
• affirming court’s factual finding, which differed from stipulated facts, because, inter alia, court was “obligated” to base finding on additional relevant information where it existed
• holding there is no such thing as a non-violent burglary
• “[F]or purposes of determining career offender status under the Guidelines, there is no such thing as a non-violent kidnapping…”
• “[F]or purposes of determining career offender status under the Guidelines, there is no such thing as a non-violent kidnapping…”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).