United States v. Donald William Hogan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the justification for a protective sweep of even a few minutes would be questionable in light of the officer’s concession that after arresting the defendant in front of his house, the officer could have just put the defendant in the car and driven away
• questioning whether a protective sweep would be needed if police could have put the defendant in the car and driven away
• “If we assume that the officers initially had (continued…) 15 The government has not claimed, and there is no evidence, that the Marshals discovered appellant’s cell phone in plain view (or otherwise

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).