United States v. Donald William Browning

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Direct proof of intent is not necessary. It may be inferred from the acts of the parties and the facts and circumstances of the case. It rarely can be shown by direct evidence. Collateral and related conduct may be considered by the jury for the purpose.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).