Skip to main content
· 6/25/2007

United States v. Donald W. Gallimore

Citations

  • 491 F.3d 871
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 15088
  • 2007 WL 1804394

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the only intent necessary to convict a defendant under 18 U.S.C. § 1513(b) for retaliating against a witness, victim, or informant “was an intent to retali- ate” (internal quotations omitted)
  • “It is apparent from the guidelines and commentary that the Sentencing Commission was concerned that retaliation against a witness for 45 past testimony was likely to interfere with the effective administration of justice.” (footnote omitted)
  • “Although § 2X3.1 normally applies to convictions for being an accessory after the fact, in the context of the § 2J1.2(c) cross reference provision, it merely serves as a tool for calculating the base offense level for particularly serious obstruction offenses.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Colloton, Hansen, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.