United States v. Donald Turner, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[s]imply asserting— without explanation—that the [evidence] is relevant to a material issue such as intent or knowledge is not enough to establish its admissibility under the Federal Rules”
• reviewing the construction and application of the Guidelines de novo; factual findings are reviewed for clear error
• explaining the government’s burden and stating that “[s]imply asserting—without explanation—that the [evidence of any other crime, wrong, or act] is relevant to a material issue such as intent or knowledge is not enough to establish its admissibility under the Federal Rules”
• construction and application of Guidelines are reviewed de novo; factual findings are reviewed for clear error
• construction and application of Guidelines are reviewed de novo; factual findings are reviewed for clear error
• construction and application of Guidelines are reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).