United States v. Donald Santagata

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admitting allegedly repetitive evidence proving a fraud scheme because that \repetition . . . was itself distinctly probative\ of the scheme
• where pleadings and record evidence show that court was aware of its Rule 403 responsibility, express findings not necessary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).