Skip to main content
· 4/11/1989

United States v. Donald Ray Emanuel

Citations

  • 869 F.2d 795
  • 1989 WL 21939

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sentencing proceedings did not violate due process where defendant contested certain details of government's proffer but did not produce evidence to show his version of disputed matters was accurate

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sprouse, Chapman, Motz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.