· 2/9/2001
United States v. Donald Newell
Citations
- 239 F.3d 917
- 87 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 850
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1898
- 2001 WL 109525
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- for judicial estoppel to apply, prior inconsistent argument must have been accepted by the court in some manner
- “exclusionary rules are disfavored as remedies for nonconstitutional violations of law”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Posner, Ripple, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.