United States v. Donald L. Martin and Judy S. Weems

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining that a defendant’s rights were not violated by the district court’s failure to administer the oath following voir dire
• “Swearing the jury . . . serves to emphasize the importance and seriousness of the juror’s task. . . .”
• remanding for the limited purpose of an evidentiary hearing to determine whether jurors overheard judge's comments relating to defendant's guilt spoken during bench conference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).