United States v. Donald Gene Henthorn

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the district court erred in denying plaintiff’s discovery request for impeachment material contained in the testifying officers’ personnel files” and remanding for in camera review of those files
• “We need not reach the issue [of] whether the prosecution had an obligation to examine [a detective’s] files, as the record shows that [the detective] did not testify at trial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).