United States v. Donald Edward Rowley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming increase where unloaded weapons found where defendant also kept drugs
• \we have always required evidence that the defendant directed or procured the aid of underlings\
• “[W]e have always required evidence that the defendant directed or procured the aid of underlings.”
• “The exposure of the jury to improper communications or extrinsic material evidence creates a presumption of -7- prejudice, and therefore a presumption of an infringement of the defendant’s Sixth Amendment right to trial by an impartial jury.”
• upholding admission of defendant’s proffer statements for impeachment purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).