Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
· 6/3/1997

United States v. Donald E. Lukens

Citations

  • 114 F.3d 1220
  • 325 U.S. App. D.C. 12
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 12797
  • 1997 WL 289194

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “An act need not be independently illegal in order to qualify as an overt act for the purposes of a conspiracy charge.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Sentelle, Henderson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.