United States v. Donald Berry Burns, United States of America v. Joseph L. Laforney

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that in context of post-conviction challenges to an indictment on multiplicity grounds, appropriate remedy is to vacate only offend- ing convictions
• holding that all but one of the multiplicitous charges must be vacated
• holding that all but one of the multiplicitous charges must be vacated
• holding Burns's lawyer did not have an actual conflict of interest that adversely affected his representation
• holding Burns's lawyer did not have an actual conflict of interest that adversely affected his representation
• grievance filed against defendant’s attorney three days before trial did not create a conflict of interest

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).