Skip to main content
· 2/7/2000

United States v. Don H. Pace, Opinion

Citations

  • 201 F.3d 1116
  • 2000 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 999
  • 2000 Daily Journal DAR 1475
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 1598
  • 2000 WL 130729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We need not consider the first two elements [of a collateral order] because [defendant]’s [challenge] is reviewable on appeal from a final judgment.”
  • “Under the collateral order doctrine, a small class of decisions are appealable under § 1291 even though they do not terminate the underlying action. We have jurisdiction to hear an appeal of a district court’s interlocutory order if the order (1

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Browning, Rymer, Kleinfeld

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.