Skip to main content
· 8/22/1995

United States v. Domino

Citations

  • 62 F.3d 716
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23754
  • 1995 WL 497332

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that defendant stipulated only to using “a telephone to call a DEA agent about purchasing [a chemical] for the purpose of manufacturing a controlled substance,” which did not specifically establish that he possessed the chemical
  • assuming that the factual resume--the equivalent of the \factual basis\ in this case--can contain stipulations
  • assuming that the factual resume--the equivalent of the \factual basis\ in this case--can contain stipulations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: DeMOSS, Smith, Wiener

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.