Skip to main content
· 4/3/1985

United States v. Dominick Martino

Citations

  • 759 F.2d 998
  • 17 Fed. R. Serv. 1136
  • 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 30336

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defendant acknowledged association with alleged co-conspirators on three separate occasions, including being present in same parking lot during transaction
  • defendant’s presence in parking lot, coupled with elaborate coming and going, while narcotics were openly passed between co-conspirators was probative of defendant’s knowing involvement in the conspiracy
  • “Thus, the government in an effort to meet its burden of proof was certainly entitled to offer this prior similar act evidence to aid the jury in assessing [the defendant’s] intentions during his presence on at least three separate occasions during ongoing drug transactions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Van Graafeiland, Pierce, Pratt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.