United States v. Dominic Santarelli, in Re United States of America

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing between an in camera proceeding held to allow the defendant to present objections to the PSR and an open sentencing hearing where the government submits extrinsic evidence material to sentencing
• distinguishing between an in camera proceeding held to allow the defendant to present objections to the PSR and an open sentencing hearing where the government submits extrinsic evidence material to sentencing
• “[T]he public has a First Amendment right to see and hear that which is admitted in evidence in a public sentencing hearing.”
• “[IJnclusion in the presentence report ... of information known to the Government which is material to sentencing does not ipso facto confer a status of secrecy or privilege upon the information which did not previously exist.”
• “[I]nclusion in the presentence report . . . of information known to the Government which is material to sentencing does not ipso facto confer a status of secrecy or privilege upon the information which did not previously exist.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).