United States v. Dmytro Patiutka

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that credibility determination made at pretrial suppression hearing entitled to “particular deference” (alterations and internal quotation marks omitted)
• “We owe particular deference 11 USCA4 Appeal: 23-4631 Doc: 61 Filed: 03/05/2026 Pg: 12 of 13 to a district court’s credibility determinations, for it is the role of the district court to observe witnesses and weigh their credibility during a pre-trial motion to suppress.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).