Skip to main content
· 7/10/1991

United States v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 768 F. Supp. 365
  • 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9455
  • 1991 WL 142848

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that Rule 59(e) motions are “extraordinary and sparingly granted”
  • collecting cases dismissing, at the Rule 12 stage, promissory estoppel claims on this basis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Penn

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.