Skip to main content
· 7/24/1997

United States v. Dist. Council of New York City

Citations

  • 972 F. Supp. 756
  • 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10871
  • 1997 WL 418190

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • intervenors not permitted to object to plan implemented under consent decree because court’s jurisdiction was limited to implementation of consent decree, not all matters concerning conduct of parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Haight

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.