Skip to main content
· 9/27/2005

United States v. Disney

Citations

  • 62 M.J. 46
  • 2005 CAAF LEXIS 1090
  • 2005 WL 2413401

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • looking inter alia to legislative history to divine the purpose of a statute criminalizing the certain activities with explosive materials
  • determining, based on the facts of the case, that the statute at issue was “constitutional as applied to [a]ppellant’s conduct”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.