Skip to main content
· 11/13/2003

United States v. Dion Lawrence

Citations

  • 349 F.3d 109
  • 62 Fed. R. Serv. 1333
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 23358
  • 2003 WL 22697997

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that no due process violation occurred where defendant’s photo was the only one in the array that was not a mug shot and thus differed in coloring and shading and depicted him smiling, bare-chested, and wearing jewelry, in contrast to the other photos
  • six photo array not unduly suggestive

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Roth, McKee, Cowen

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.