United States v. Dion

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that rights granted to a tribe by treaty may be abrogated by Congress
• holding that rights granted to a tribe by treaty may be abrogated by Congress
• holding that the Eagle Protection Act “abrogates” treaty right to hunt eagles
• holding that the Eagle Protection Act \abrogates\ treaty right to hunt eagles
• finding that “[w]hat is essential is clear evidence that Congress actually considered the conflict .... and chose to resolve that conflict by abrogating the treaty”
• explaining that “treaty rights can be asserted by . . . an individual member of the Tribe”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).