United States v. Diesel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the military judge should have inquired into the purpose of the introduction of such testimony, and instructed the members if appropriate
• noting, without comment, that “testimonial res gestae,” could permit the admission of statements “necessary to complete the chronological sequence of [an] agent’s story”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).