Virgin Islands· 2/21/2002
United States v. Diaz-Nin
Citations
- 221 F. Supp. 2d 584
- 2002 WL 334918
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3393
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that an alien with only one conviction had a strong likelihood of being granted Section 212(c) relief based on the fact that she had three children in the United States and had “close ties to the community”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Moore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
3 cases in this archive cite this case.
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. CyrSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 2,984×
- United States v. Mendoza-LopezSupreme Court· 1987-05-26· cited 703×
- Nevada v. HicksSupreme Court· 2001-06-25· cited 439×
- MARINBoard of Immigration Appeals· 1978-07-01· cited 360×
- Perceira Goncalves v. INSFirst Circuit· 1998-05-18· cited 230×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1999-01-26· cited 169×
- SILVABoard of Immigration Appeals· 1976-07-01· cited 167×
- James Scheidemann v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceThird Circuit· 1996-05-16· cited 84×
- Francisca Elena Ortega De Robles v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceNinth Circuit· 1995-06-02· cited 77×
- Stavros Katsis v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceThird Circuit· 1993-08-09· cited 69×
- Gustavo Castellon-Contreras v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceSeventh Circuit· 1995-01-10· cited 57×
- Lloyd Aston Graham v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceThird Circuit· 1993-07-12· cited 26×
- Haruna Dabone v. Lyle L. Karn, District Director of the Immigration and Naturalization Service, District No. 4Third Circuit· 1985-06-07· cited 16×
- United States v. Gonzalez-RoqueS.D. New York· 2001-09-25· cited 6×
Other cases named United States v. Diaz-Nin
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.