Skip to main content
· 3/20/1972

United States v. Diapulse Corporation of America, Also Known as the Diapulse Manufacturing Corporation of America, a Corporation

Citations

  • 457 F.2d 25
  • 1972 U.S. App. LEXIS 10620

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating “[t]he passage of a statute is in a sense, an implied finding that violations will harm the public and ought, if necessary, be restrained”
  • rejecting arguments that requirement to file tax returns violates the Fifth 26 or Thirteenth Amendments
  • “The passage of the statute is, in a sense, an implied finding that violations will harm the public and ought, if necessary, be restrained.”
  • injunction which puts defendant out of business not impermissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Feinberg, Mulligan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.