Skip to main content
· 1/27/2000

United States v. Diane J. Williamson

Citations

  • 202 F.3d 974
  • 53 Fed. R. Serv. 1191
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 984
  • 2000 WL 66523

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The right to cross-examination is not unlimited; the Confrontation Clause guarantees only effective cross-examination, not cross-examination of any type sought by the defendant.”
  • “A matter is collateral if it could not have been introduced into 13 evidence for any purpose other than contradiction.” (citation omitted)
  • Confrontation Clause protects defendant’s right to effectively cross-exam- ine witnesses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ripple, Kanne, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.