· 1/27/2000
United States v. Diane J. Williamson
Citations
- 202 F.3d 974
- 53 Fed. R. Serv. 1191
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 984
- 2000 WL 66523
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The right to cross-examination is not unlimited; the Confrontation Clause guarantees only effective cross-examination, not cross-examination of any type sought by the defendant.”
- “A matter is collateral if it could not have been introduced into 13 evidence for any purpose other than contradiction.” (citation omitted)
- Confrontation Clause protects defendant’s right to effectively cross-exam- ine witnesses
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ripple, Kanne, Wood
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.