Skip to main content
Federal & State Lawfederalstatelaw.com
Home/Federal/Cases
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces· 6/13/2001

United States v. Dewrell

Citations

  • 55 M.J. 131
  • 2001 CAAF LEXIS 675
  • 2001 WL 668811

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding a “barebones assertion” by an appellant that his trial defense counsel prevented him from testifying is insufficient to require a post-trial evidentiary hearing
  • noting that “prior dicta on this issue have intimated, in view of the language Congress used in Rules 413 and 414, relevancy is all but mandated.”
  • noting that a military judge is not required to make detailed findings of fact under Mil. R. Evid. 403, but must, nevertheless, fully evaluate the evidence and make a clear record of the reasoning behind its findings
  • eiting United States v. Guardia, 135 F.3d 1326, 1331 (10th Cir.1998)
  • “[a]s Rules 413 and 414 are essentially the same in substance, the analysis for proper admission of evidence under either should be the same”
  • “As Rules 413 and 414 are essentially the same in substance, the analysis for proper admission of evidence under either should be the same.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Crawford, Sullivan, Gierke, Effron, Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

53 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named United States v. Dewrell

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.