United States v. Dewayne Luster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the admitted evidence “helped the jury piece together the contours of the charged conspiracy and the relationships among its actors”
• holding that the admitted evidence “helped the jury piece together the contours of the charged con- spiracy and the relationships among its actors”
• explaining that acts that are “inextricably intertwined” are outside of Rule 404(b), because that rule applies only to “other” crimes, wrongs, or acts
• explaining that acts that are “inextricably intertwined” are outside of Rule 404(b), because that rule applies only to “other” crimes, wrongs, or acts
• sentencing court’s fact-finding on the weapon’s enhancement is reviewed for clear error
• “[T]he district court must determine that the coconspirator’s firearm possession was reasonably foreseeable to the defendant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).