United States v. Desnoyers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the Court “need not determine the continuing validity of the Papadakis caveat” because it did not apply there where “an overwhelming amount of the evidence at trial was not relevant solely to the [unproven] object”
• first quoting United States v. Aguilar, 15 585 F.3d 652, 656 (2d Cir. 2009); and then quoting Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 16 307, 319 (1979)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).