Skip to main content
· 8/13/2004

United States v. Desmond Ollivierre, A/K/A James Franklin Bridges

Citations

  • 378 F.3d 412
  • 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 16681
  • 2004 WL 1802160

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that it is “improper for a prosecutor to launch a personal attack upon the defense attorney or upon defense lawyers generally”
  • finding that the prosecution’s comments, including that defense counsel “tries to weave in distorted facts to try to make his argument,” were not improper
  • flight instruction appropriate where defendant absconded after release on bond
  • \[T]he Sixth Amendment's right to counsel mandate[s] a prosecutor to refrain from such attacks against defense counsel . . . . Any comment by the prosecution that disparages a defendant's decision to exercise his Sixth Amendment right to counsel is thus improper.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams, King, Flanagan, Eastern

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.