United States v. Derrick D. Moore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that testimony in a bank robbery trial establishing that a defendant met a coconspirator while in prison was not improper inasmuch as it proved a “prior relationship” that “was relevant in proving that the [co-conspirators] had a common plan”
• “But they had — the drugs were in that storage unit. And he had, we got not one but two loaded weapons there.”
• failure to raise arguments in opening memorandum or brief leads to forfeiture

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).