· 7/26/1995
United States v. Derrick A. Anderson
Citations
- 61 F.3d 1290
- 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19930
- 1995 WL 440817
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “We have held that a district court commits plain error when it applies the sentencing Guidelines in a manner that violates the Ex Post Facto Clause.”
- “We have held that a district court commits plain error when it applies the sentencing Guidelines in a manner that violates the Ex Post Facto Clause.”
- \we have held that a district court commits plain error when it applies the sentencing guidelines in a manner that violates the Ex Post Facto Clause.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Ripple, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.