Skip to main content
· 7/26/1995

United States v. Derrick A. Anderson

Citations

  • 61 F.3d 1290
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 19930
  • 1995 WL 440817

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We have held that a district court commits plain error when it applies the sentencing Guidelines in a manner that violates the Ex Post Facto Clause.”
  • “We have held that a district court commits plain error when it applies the sentencing Guidelines in a manner that violates the Ex Post Facto Clause.”
  • \we have held that a district court commits plain error when it applies the sentencing guidelines in a manner that violates the Ex Post Facto Clause.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Ripple, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.