Skip to main content
· 10/2/2003

United States v. Derek John Archambault, Also Known as Derek Martinez

Citations

  • 344 F.3d 732
  • 2003 U.S. App. LEXIS 20156
  • 2003 WL 22251171

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “no court has found the Sixth Amendment right applies to routine presentence interviews”
  • noting that sixth amendment does not apply when defendant voluntarily participated in presentence investigation and that no court has found that sixth amendment right applies to routine presentence interviews
  • addressing merits of departures even though district court failed to provide written statement of reasons, where neither party raised the issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Arnold, Hansen, Smith

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.