Skip to main content
· 6/15/1995

United States v. Dennis L. Wenger

Citations

  • 58 F.3d 280
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 14736
  • 1995 WL 357781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[i]f the agreement is voluntary and taken in compliance with Rule 11, then the waiver ... must be honored”
  • sentencing appeal waivers are presumed valid where the underlying plea is valid
  • “Defendants who appeal from sentences following plea agreements always point to unanticipated ... developments,” (emphasis in original)
  • “[Defendant] exchanged the right to appeal for prosecutorial concessions; he cannot have his cake and eat it too.”
  • \[Defendant] exchanged the right to appeal for prosecutorial concessions; he cannot have his cake and eat it too.\
  • “[A] defendant inclined against appeal or willing to forgo it—perhaps to put an unpleasant episode behind him more quickly—may obtain a concession from the prosecutor.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cummings, Easterbrook, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.