United States v. Dennis B. Moore, Sr., United States of America v. Keven L. Wyrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that district court's credibility determination concerning juror partiality \cannot be manifest error; indeed it is virtually unassailable on appeal\
• deciding that the district court did not err when it did not dismiss one of the counts or require the government to elect between them
• concluding that the district court eliminated the risk of multiplicitous convictions or punishment by instructing the jurors that they need not consider the conspiracy murder charge if they found the defendant guilty of continuing criminal enterprise murder
• stating these elements in terms of both the “engaging in” and “working in furtherance” alternatives
• stating the elements in terms of both “engaging in” and “working in furtherance of,” but requiring for either element that there be a “substantive connection” between the killing and the CCE or conspiracy
• elements of murder while engaging in or working in furtherance of a CCE

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).