United States v. Denis Rivera, A/K/A Conejo, United States of America v. Noe David Ramirez-Guardado, A/K/A Tricky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• providing that “[a]ctive participation or engagement . . . is not required” for the doctrine of forfeiture by wrongdoing to apply
• stating “[a]ctive participation or engagement . . . is not required” for forfeiture-by-wrongdoing to apply
• stating “[a]ctive participation or engagement . . . is not required” for forfeiture by wrongdoing to apply and noting dictionary defines acquiescence as “the act or condition of acquiescing or giving tacit assent; agreement or consent by silence or without objection”
• “[a]ctive participation or engagement, or *** the personal commission of the crime, is not required”
• “[a]ctive participation or engagement, or *** the personal commission of the crime, is not required”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).